A complaint submitted by Simon Edgley document outlines ongoing issues connected to safeguarding, communication, and administrative handling by public bodies.
According to the document, concerns had been raised repeatedly over time but had not resulted in effective resolution.
The content refers to continuing distress, unresolved risk, and perceived failures to respond appropriately to information provided.
From a legal perspective, the matters described raise issues relating to safeguarding duties, procedural fairness, and the treatment of individuals who have disclosed vulnerability.
Where safeguarding concerns are raised, public bodies are generally under a duty to assess risk, take reasonable preventative steps, and document decision-making.
The document also raises potential issues under equality and public law principles, particularly where communication difficulties or health-related impairments are disclosed.
Failure to make reasonable adjustments or to engage meaningfully with disclosed needs may engage statutory obligations.
Overall, the document highlights ongoing concerns about unresolved safeguarding conditions and administrative response, with potential legal implications relating to duty of care, safeguarding compliance, and accountability.
Note:
The GP has refused to respond to this very serious application.
In order to provide full transparency regarding the Hate and Discrimination that Autistics are suffering due to Suffolk Council, Simon Edgley believes that a copy of the original document is critical, even if it causes embarrassment or humiliation.
Please be aware that this and any other document was written in the current state of Simon Edgley’s Mental Health – this means there will be anything from foul language, triggering statements, typo and grammatical errors; thus giving an insight into the differences of Mental Heath when it affects a person.